Comparative Classification of ANVISA, FDA, and MDR: Understand the Key Differences. 

The medical device industry is rife with complex regulations that vary by geographical region. Understanding the differences between the leading regulatory agencies is essential for success in the global medical device market. Here’s a comparative analysis of FDA, ANVISA, and MDR classifications and regulations. 

ASPECT FDA (USA) ANVISA (Brazil) MDR (EU) 
Classifications Class I, II, III, IV Class I, II, III, IV Class I, IIa, IIb, III 
Approval Process Pre-Market (510(k), PMA) Registration, Authorization Conformity Assessment 
Clinical Evaluation Required for some classes Required for some classes Required for some classes 
Labeling Requeriments Strict Strict Strict 
Registration Validity Not Required Class I and II – Indeterminate  
Class III and IV – 10 years 
Periódica (5 anos) 
Local Technical Responsible Not Required Required Required 
Post-Market Requeriments Surveillance e Recalls Surveillance e Recalls Surveillance e Recalls 
Regulatory Authorithy FDA ANVISA European Comission 
Jurisdiction United States Brazil European Union 

Legend: 

Class I: Low-risk medical devices. Class II: Moderate-risk medical devices. 

Class III: High-risk medical devices. Class IV: Maximum-risk medical devices. 

Observations: 

  • FDA and ANVISA adopt a risk-based approach to classification, while MDR has additional subdivisions. 
  • FDA’s approval process involves 510(k) for Class II devices and PMA for Class III and IV. 
  • MDR requires conformity assessment, and ANVISA demands authorization. 
  • MDR requires comprehensive risk assessment and is regulated by the European Commission. 
  • Each agency has jurisdiction over medical devices in their respective regions. 

It’s crucial to understand these differences when bringing medical devices to specific markets. Regulatory compliance is essential for ensuring patient safety and product success. 

ANVISA ultimately determines the classification of a medical device for marketing in Brazil. Materials, equipment, orthopedics, and IVDs have their respective standards, RDC 751/2022 and RDC 36/2015, which determine how products should be classified and how models should be grouped into families, kits, or systems. At BRISA ADVISORS, we offer a free classification service and determination of the regulatory pathway upon receiving product usage instructions at contactBR@brisa.com.br. 

#MedicalDevices #Regulations #Health #FDA #ANVISA #MDR 

Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes and does not replace consultation with the official regulations of the corresponding regulatory agencies. Always consult official sources for precise and up-to-date guidance. 

*Schedule a meeting at MEDICA Düsseldorf, Germany, from November 13 to 16, 2023. 

Budget for registration ownership transfer, Market Access Strategy, and BPO in RA services for your company: www.brisa.com.br 

* Budget for the registration ownership transfer, Market Access Strategy and BPO in RA services for your company: www.brisa.com.br 

Brisa Advisors is a consultancy company for foreign manufacturers of medical devices who wish to enter the Brazilian market.

Contact

© 2023 Brisa Advisors

All rights reserved.